Legal Opinion · Concurrence

MacKenzie v. Miller Brewing Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2001No. 97-3542Published

1Concurrence

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶ 32. (concurring). The lengthy majority opinion boils down to adopting this rule of law: When an employer deliberately and intentionally lies to an at-will employee to induce the employee to continue employment and the employee continues to work relying on those lies, and then sustains damages as a result of reliance on the lies, the employee cannot sue in a tort action for damages. I cannot join this opinion.

¶ 33. Wisconsin's general rule of law is that everyone is liable for damages for intentional misrepresentation.1 The majority opinion carves out an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brodsky v. Hercules, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API