Legal Opinion
Jay v. Siemens AG
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 30, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-10267-RWZPublished
1Opinion of the Court
RYA W. ZOBEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Andrew Jay, formerly an at-will employee of defendants, alleges wrongful constructive discharge in retaliation for his internal report of extortion. Defendants move to dismiss his single-count complaint.
I. Factual Background
The following well-pleaded facts are recited as alleged in the complaint. I accept them as true for the purposes of resolving this motion. See Ocasio-Hernández v. Fortuño-Burset, 640 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2011).
Plaintiff, a Massachusetts resident, worked for 14 years in various capacities for defendant Siemens…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Rodriguez-Reyes v. Molina-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.