Legal Opinion

Perez v. Brownell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 31, 1958No. 44PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

356 U.S. 44 (1958)

PEREZ

v.

BROWNELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL.

No. 44.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued May 1, 1957.

Restored to the calendar for reargument June 24, 1957.

Reargued October 28, 1957.

Decided March 31, 1958.[*]

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Charles A. Horsky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Fred Okrand, A. L. Wirin, Jack Wasserman and Salvatore C. J. Fusco.

Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for respondent on the original argument, and Solicitor General Rankin on the reargument. With them on the briefs were Warren Olney,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Frankfurter; Dissent · Warren; Dissent · Douglas.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API