Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Possehl

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

The plaintiffs, 630 of the members of Local Union No. 125 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, by this action ask that defendant Commerford be restrained from continuing to exercise powers alleged to have been employed heretofore and now to be used illegally as supervisor over and in the conduct of the affairs of Local Union No. 125 and that the defendant officers and business agents appointed or selected by *856him for said local union be similarly restrained; that said supervisor, officers and agents be required to account for the assets, moneys and property of said union and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Brookhaven v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Matter of Brown v. . Order of ForestersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Wachtel v. Noah Widows & Orphans' Benevolent SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Fritz v. KnaubNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Rodier v. HuddellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Medical Soc. of Mobile County v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Dusing v. NuzzoNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. House v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Weinstock v. LadiskyNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Madden v. AtkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API