Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 20, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari to Woodlmry District Court. — J. W. Anderson, Judge. Writ of certiorari was issued on application of plaintiff, to which return was made, and the record is here for review.-

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1. Intoxicating liquors : con-quantities: piesumption. Barney Kopel, during the period in question, occupied the second story of the dwelling house known as 121(1 Sixth Street, Sioux City, as a residence. On May 25, 1917, a decree of court enjoined him from .... maintaining his place of residence as a liquor nuisance. Thereafter, on August o, the plaintiff herein filed an information, alleging that Kopel had violated the terms of the decree by selling and keeping for sale in his residence intoxicating liquors, and therefore was guilty of contempt of court. A precept was thereupon issued,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nies v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. State v. HaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Shidler v. Keenan Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joyner v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. McMillan v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. McMillan v. SumnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. McMillan v. SearsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API