Legal Opinion

David Gary Hoover v. Don Byrd, Sheriff of Dallas County Texas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1986No. 85-1647PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH HOLLAN JONES, Circuit Judge:

The only issue presented for review in this habeas corpus proceeding is whether the Texas Obscenity Statute, Texas Penal Code Annotated, Section 43.21, defines the term “patently offensive” in a manner inconsistent with the First Amendment. The petitioner alleges that the jury in his commercial obscenity criminal trial was improperly charged according to the erroneous statutory definition. We find, after further reflection on this issue which we have previously declined to consider, that the statutory definition passes constitutional muster.

The Supreme Court,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. PrybaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Robert Joe Garcia Easley, Jr., United States of America v. Jacquelyn L. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Asaff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. Flynn v. Southern Seamless Floors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. Hoover v. ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API