Tredway v. Riley
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Dakota county. Tried below before Powers, J. Niles v. Frier, 35 la., 41; Monty v.Arneson, 25 Id., 383; State v. Harris, 36 Id., 137; Wahemanv. Chambers, 69 Id., 169; Fear son v. Distillery, 72 Id.,-348; Welton v. Mo., 91 U: v. Harris, 8 Id., 142; Wilson v. Butler, 33 Eng. Com. S., 275; Co. of Mobile v. Kimball, 102 Id., 691; Brown v. Houston, 114 Id., 622; Cooley v. Board, 12 How. [U. S.J, 299; Bowman v. R. Co., 125 U. S., 465; Cooper Man.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Dakota county. Tried below before Powers, J. Niles v. Frier, 35 la., 41; Monty v.Arneson, 25 Id., 383; State v. Harris, 36 Id., 137; Wahemanv. Chambers, 69 Id., 169; Fear son v. Distillery, 72 Id.,-348; Welton v. Mo., 91 U: v. Harris, 8 Id., 142; Wilson v. Butler, 33 Eng. Com. S., 275; Co. of Mobile v. Kimball, 102 Id., 691; Brown v. Houston, 114 Id., 622; Cooley v. Board, 12 How. [U. S.J, 299; Bowman v. R. Co., 125 U. S., 465; Cooper Man. Co. v. Ferguson, 113 Id., 727; Slate v. Saunders, 19 Kan., 127; State v. Stilsing, 20 Atl. Rep. [N. J.], 65. Kanaga v.…
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This action was brought in the county court of Dakota county by the plaintiff in ei’ror to recover the sum .of $826.15 on an account for beer sold at Sioux City, in the state of Iowa, by the Franz Brewing Company to the defendant in error. Before suit the account was sold to the plaintiff. The petitipn is in the usual form.
The defendant answered:
“ First — That he admits that he made a contract for the purchase of beer from the Franz Brewing Company, at the time in the said-petition set forth, and that the defendant purchased beer of said brewing company at said times; but, as to the amount so…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Service v. Sumpter Valley Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Alexander v. BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- State ex rel. Bartlett v. FraserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilson v. ParrishNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Review of Assessment of Personal PropertyNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.