Legal Opinion

Rounds v. Maryland National Capital Park & Planning Commission

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 9, 2013No. 889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

On October 17, 2011, William Rounds, Marvin Gaither, Clifton Lee, James Bell, Bernice Martin, and Robert and Michelle Awkard (together, “appellants”) filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County an Amended Complaint, in which appellants alleged that: (1) the Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission (“the Commission”), Macris, Hendricks, and Glascock, P.A. (“MHG”), Douglas H. Riggs, III, Warren Brown, Paul and Sara Arey, Charles and Marilyn Mess, Audrey Hill, and Milton Johnson (together, “appellees”) have “taken steps to prevent access to and use of [appellants’] properties”…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Dual v. Lockheed Martin CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Prince George's County v. LongtinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rounds v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. Espina v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Chicago Title Insurance Company v. DelgadoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
  4. Rounds v. M-NCPPCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Wilkinson v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, St. Mary's Cnty.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API