Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Ware

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1936No. Civil No. 3562Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Sid W. Ellery was the state superintendent of banks from November 1, 1931, to August 4, 1932, and the defendant Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland was surety on his bond.

The plaintiff, Ware, brought this action against the surety to recover as damages the balance of his deposit, and the balances of the deposits of his several assignors (98 in number), in the Arizona Bank on June 24, 1932, the date said bank was taken over by Ellery for liquidation, claiming that it was through the negligence and unlawful acts of said Ellery in the performance of his official duties that said deposits were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kendall v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Deatsch v. FairfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Mills v. American Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Morrill County v. BlissNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Sanders State Bank v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API