Legal Opinion

State v. Boyajian

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 17, 1975PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

In the York County Superior Court the defendant was charged in two indictments with selling dextropropoxyphene, a potent medicinal substance, in violation of 22 M. R.S.A. § 2210. 1 The two cases were consolidated for trial and the jury made specific findings of guilt in each case. 2 Judgments were accordingly entered from which the defendant has appealed, asserting three points as a basis for the appeal, which we deny.

I

Fundamental to the appeal is the contention that Section 2210 is unconstitutional because the statute unlawfully delegates legislative authority to the Board…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hinds v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
  2. State v. DavenportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Dow v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  4. Lawrence W. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
  5. State v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. People v. TurmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. ReardonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. Mundy Ex Rel. Pamela v. SimmonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API