Legal Opinion

Nash v. Goor

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1963No. 7010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.

Action was brought to recover a real estate broker’s commission allegedly owing for a sale of real property located within the City of Phoenix. The matter was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered for defendant. From this the plaintiff appeals principally on the grounds that the evidence does not support the judgment.

It is elementary to say that this Court is bound by the facts found in the trial court where there is any evidence to support them. Clark v. Ellsworth, 66 Ariz. 119, 184 P.2d 821 (1947). In the case before us, not just a part…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Fink v. WilliamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bowser v. SandigeArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Miller Cattle Co. v. ChambersArizona Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Williams v. LongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Harris v. MurchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. State Land Department v. Painted Desert Park, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Tri-State Insurance Company v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API