Nash v. Goor
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.
Action was brought to recover a real estate broker’s commission allegedly owing for a sale of real property located within the City of Phoenix. The matter was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered for defendant. From this the plaintiff appeals principally on the grounds that the evidence does not support the judgment.
It is elementary to say that this Court is bound by the facts found in the trial court where there is any evidence to support them. Clark v. Ellsworth, 66 Ariz. 119, 184 P.2d 821 (1947). In the case before us, not just a part…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Fink v. WilliamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Bowser v. SandigeArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Miller Cattle Co. v. ChambersArizona Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Williams v. LongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Harris v. MurchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- State Land Department v. Painted Desert Park, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Tri-State Insurance Company v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.