Legal Opinion

Tucson Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 29, 1992No. 1 CA-TX 91-0039PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Judge.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the legal incidence of Arizona’s transaction privilege tax falls upon the purchaser of prime contracting services and thereby violates the federal government’s constitutional immunity from state taxation when the federal government acts as a purchaser. We also consider whether the Arizona Department of Revenue, in enforcing the transaction privilege tax, systematically discriminated against in-state contractors in its audit selection process and thereby violated their right to equal protection of the law. We find no…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. South Carolina v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Washington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Nancy E. Wilson, United States of America v. Buddy Rex WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Karbal v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. MacH v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Sonitrol of Maricopa County v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Premiere RV & Mini Storage LLC v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Aida Renta Trust v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API