Legal Opinion

Schayer v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1944Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks an injunction against, and an accounting by, all of the defendants, except Abraham J. Willner and Wallace & Tieman Products, Inc., who have not been served, alleging that they have infringed four United States patents No. 1,728,974 for an arcuate film splice, No. 1,734,140 for a film splicing machine, No. 1,734,141 for a film splicer, and No. 1,734,142 for a film splicer and rewinder, the first issued September 24, 1929, and the last three November 5, 1929.

The facts are stipulated. Plaintiff’s ownership of the patents and their validity, as well as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  5. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API