Legal Opinion

Hrivnak v. Perrone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1977No. 138Published

1Opinion of the Court

472 Pa. 348 (1977)

372 A.2d 730

Andrew HRIVNAK, Appellant,

v.

William J. PERRONE.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 23, 1975.

Decided April 28, 1977.

Jack R. Sparacino, Belle Vernon, for appellant.

John E. Hall, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before JONES, C.J., and EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NIX, Justice.

The central issue raised in this appeal concerns the sua sponte charge of the trial court relating to a theory of recovery not raised by plaintiff-appellant and in fact refuted by the testimony offered on appellant's behalf. For this reason the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. McCay v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API