Legal Opinion

Fernandes v. Singh

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 2017No. C080264Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 10/5/17; Modified and Certified for Pub. 11/2/17 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- TAMMY FERNANDES, C080264 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2013- 00146694-CU-BC-GDS) v. RAJ SINGH et al., Defendants and Appellants. Tammy Fernandes successfully sued vexatious litigant Raj Singh and his wife Kiran Rawat individually and as trustees of the Sita Ram--or “Sitaram”--Trust (Trust), for wrongful eviction and related claims. She obtained an award of compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Roby v. McKesson Corp.California Supreme Court · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API