Legal Opinion
Dintzis v. Hayden
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 30, 1992No. 356 Misc. Docket 1991PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Before us in our original jurisdiction are preliminary objections filed by Richard Hayden, Robert W. O’Donnell, Ralph Acosta, Anthony Hardy Williams and Nicholas J. Maiale (collectively Defendant Members), who are members of Pennsylvania’s House of Representatives, in response to a “Complaint in Equity for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief” filed by the named Plaintiffs, who can briefly be described as citizen groups which oppose higher taxes.
The complaint alleges that on or about August 3,1991 the Pennsylvania House of Representatives (House) was considering House Bill 1536…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Sweeney v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Zemprelli v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kilgore v. MageeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Common Cause/Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Gray v. HaferCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Pennsylvania ex rel. George v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- League of Women Voters v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Blackwell v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.