In re Martin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
The Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office rejected claims 1 to 12, inclusive, of appellant’s application No. 289,262 for a patent on a method of refining petroleum oils to produce low viscosity lubricant oils. All the claims except claim 10 were rejected as defining aggregations and as reciting nothing patentable over the prior art cited. Claim 10 is drawn to a nonelected species and its! allowability depends upon the allowance of certain of the other claims.
The Board of Appeals affirmed the action of the Primary Examiner and appellant’s appeal here is from its decision.
In this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re ChristmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of Frederick K. KirchnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of John Bulina (Deceased) and Jack T. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of BoogeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Application of Frederick K. KirchnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In re MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946