Legal Opinion

State v. Falk

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from, Wyandotte District Court. Prosecution for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law. On November 29, 1890, on the 14 counts on which the defendant, Falh, was found guilty, he was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and costs, and to imprisonment in the county jail for 30 days, on each count. He appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

*499Opinion by

Green, C.:

The appellant was charged, in an information containing 60 counts, with violating the prohibitory law, in. Wyandotte county. A plea in abatement was filed, and sustained, except as to the first 14 counts in the information. The defendant was afterward arraigned, and entered the plea of not guilty, and was tried and convicted on 14 counts.

I. The appellant claims that the court erred in overruling in part his plea in abatement, and assigns as a reason that the information did not state his name correctly; that it purported to inform against Rheinhardt Valk, while his name is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PfefferleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. State v. AllisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Doughty ex rel. Woods v. EnglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. State v. CantrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Hamilton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. State v. TrotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API