Legal Opinion

Wimbish v. Lea

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1937No. 27279Published

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

On December 3, 1931, Fan-’ nie Lea desired to obtain a divorce from her husband 'and to quiet her title in certain lands which she claimed her husband had conveyed to her by deeds which, she claimed, had since been altered by the erasure of her name as grantee and the substitution of the name of Sue Le'a for hor own. She claimed that her huband had forced her to make such erasure and substitution, and to add her own name as one of the grantors.

On that date she entered into a written contract with the plaintiff in error, who is an attorney, whereunder she agreed to pay him for his services…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boulding v. SlickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Smith v. Westgate Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Whitehead v. SpriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API