Legal Opinion

Birnbaum v. Airborne Freight Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas A. Stander, J.

The defendant, Airborne Freight Corporation (Airborne), seeks summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint. The plaintiff’s, Jay B. Birnbaum, doing business as Jay Birnbaum Company (hereinafter jointly referred to as Birnbaum), *101complaint seeks restitution in the amount of $47,213.21 for out-of-pocket expenses allegedly incurred by plaintiff for making improvements to premises proposed to be leased. These expenses include a new roof,, a building permit fee, architect’s plans, building materials, and legal fees. The parties concede that they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farash v. Sykes Datatronics, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Landcom, Inc. v. Galen-Lyons Joint Landfill CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Absher Construction Corp. v. ColinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Farash v. Sykes Datatronics, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API