Legal Opinion

Landis Machine Co. v. Konantz Saddlery Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1908PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Ward County; Goss, J. Action by the Landis Machine Company against the Konantz Saddlery Company. Judgment . for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.

This is an action for damages for the conversion of a harness stitching machine alleged to have been owned by the plaintiff under a conditional sale contract. The plaintiff sold the machine to the firm of Birch & Fladagar, to be paid for in install*311ments, and each note representing an installment to’be paid, provided that the title to the machine should remain in the seller until it was fully paid for. Before final payment, the purchasers sold the machine to the defendants, who took the same into its possession and refused to turn it over to plaintiff after due demand. Damages are claimed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Myers v. LongstaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Ness v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Henry v. MaherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. McNab v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Hall Oil Co. v. BarquinWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Buchanan v. Occident Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Dixon v. HartnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Boyle v. MountfordWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API