State v. . Willis

The opinion in this case, delivered at the last term (104 N. C., 764), clearly indicates that the Court held that the area in question was not a natural oyster-bed, and that on the special verdict the defendant was guilty. In entering the judgment, however, we inadvertently said that his Honor committed no error, whereas the judgment should have been, he erred in holding that the defendant was not guilty. For the reasons given in Cook v. Moore, 100 N. C., 294, the motion of the Attorney General to correct the judgment in the particular mentioned, must be allowed. To that end the Clerk will…