Legal Opinion

Commercial Union Fire Ins. of New York v. Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1927No. Nos. 4734-4740, 4770-4773PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Marshall and Neely owned and operated a sawmill in Mississippi. Dacus was a broker or dealer in manufactured lumber in Memphis. He made advances to the mill,' to secure which advances lumber as cut was to be piled and marked for him. Pursuant to the contract, this gave Mm, at that stage, at least an equitable interest. The contract also provided that at frequent intervals bills of sale pf the new lumber should be given to him to secure him for his advances. TMs- was done. The lumber was insured with the companies above named. A portion was later burned, and these suits…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlas Reduction Co. v. New Zealand Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Howard Savings Inst.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Firemen's Ins. Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  3. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. Hunt v. StimsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  5. Southern Surety Co. v. MotlowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API