Legal Opinion
Hoge v. . Lee
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 20, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Civil action for the recovery of damages for alleged trespass on land.
The land in controversy is represented on the plat by the letters A, B, C, D, E, F, A. The plaintiffs contend that this land is covered by the following grants, under which they claim title: (1) a grant to Thomas A. Haughton, dated 28 June, 1902, represented by the letters C, D, E, F, 1, 2, 3, C; (2) a grant to F. H. Von Eberstein, dated 28 June, 1902, represented by F, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 2, 1, F; (3) a grant to Grimes and Von
[EDITORS' NOTE: THE MAP IS ELECTRONICALLY NON-TRANSFERRABLE.], SEE 184 N.C. 46.] Eberstein, dated 9…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Doe on Dem. of Tatem v. PaineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
- Hemphill v. Hemphill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Den Ex Dem. Sasser v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1832
- Bowen v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Gaylord v. . RespassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Batson v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Sunmount Co. v. BynnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- Green v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961