Legal Opinion
Paul Varkell and Hyman Nutkis, a Partnership, T/a Pavcor Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 16, 1964No. 186-63PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Defendant offered for sale in California, as surplus property, and plaintiffs agreed to buy (among other things), some film described as follows:
“Film : Kodak Linograph Shell-burst, safety film, clear base. Exposure Index 25, 35 MM, 400 Ft. Expiration date May 1957. Est. 322 Rolls.
“Est. Acquisition Cost: $1,384.60
Apparently Unused' — Fair”
The price bid for this item was $927.36.
The contract of sale included the following provisions:
“1. Inspection.1 Bidders are invited and urged to inspect the property to be sold prior to submitting bids. Property will be available for inspection at the places…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Philip Krupp v. Federal Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Standard Magnesium Corporation, a Kansas Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Montreal Securities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
3Cited by1 opinion
- Levy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986