Stalkup v. Vancouver Clinic, Inc., PS
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 The jury in a medical malpractice case returned a special verdict finding that, although Dr. James Hampton was negligent, his negligence did not cause John Stalkup’s death. John’s1 widow, Susan Stalkup, moved for a judgment as a matter of law on the issue of proximate cause under CR 50(a)(1) and a new trial on the sole issue of damages under CR 59(a)(7). The trial court denied Susan’s motion but held that the jury’s verdict was inconsistent and ordered a new trial on all issues.
¶2 Hampton and the Vancouver Clinic, Inc., PS, appeal from the new trial order claiming that, when applying the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Bellevue v. RaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Moore v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Moore v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR CO. GROUPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Espinoza v. American Commerce InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Mears v. Bethel School District No. 403Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.