Legal Opinion

Stalkup v. Vancouver Clinic, Inc., PS

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 1, 2008No. 35682-1-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

¶1 The jury in a medical malpractice case returned a special verdict finding that, although Dr. James Hampton was negligent, his negligence did not cause John Stalkup’s death. John’s1 widow, Susan Stalkup, moved for a judgment as a matter of law on the issue of proximate cause under CR 50(a)(1) and a new trial on the sole issue of damages under CR 59(a)(7). The trial court denied Susan’s motion but held that the jury’s verdict was inconsistent and ordered a new trial on all issues.

¶2 Hampton and the Vancouver Clinic, Inc., PS, appeal from the new trial order claiming that, when applying the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Bellevue v. RaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Moore v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Moore v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR CO. GROUPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Espinoza v. American Commerce InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Mears v. Bethel School District No. 403Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API