Legal Opinion

Cline v. Sunoco, Inc. (R&M)

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 2019No. 6:17-cv-00313Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA PERRY CLINE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 6:17-cv-313-JAG SUNOCO, INC. (R&M), and, SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS, L.P., Defendants. OPINION Perry Cline represents class members who own interests in oil wells in Oklahoma. The defendants, Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), and Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals, L.P. (“Sunoco”), purchase and sell oil from the wells. Sunoco pays the class members proceeds when it sells the oil. Oklahoma’s Production Revenue Standards Act…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API