Martinez v. Department of Homeland Security
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket # 5) and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 9). 1 The parties have attached exhibits in support of each motion and both motions have been fully briefed. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers and the decision process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. MiCH. LR 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be resolved on the briefs submitted. For…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- James H. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRATTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Fred S. Almy, and D.E. Stolberg, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Sead Pilica v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Susie J. Jackson v. Richards Medical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tennessee v. United States Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022