Legal Opinion

Coblentz v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1955PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This action involves the right to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of this state, commenced by Chris Coblentz, as plaintiff, against the State Industrial Accident Commission, as defendant. Defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint was sustained, and, plaintiff refusing to plead further, judgment was entered dismissing the cause with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals.

It is alleged in plaintiff’s complaint that he was employed by Columbia River Logging Company as a truck driver; that he was hired within the state of Oregon, and that his employer’s office and principal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Musgrave Et Ux. v. Lucas Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Williams v. Pacific Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Fishburn v. LondershausenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. McDonald v. CruzenOregon Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hawkins v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Plummer v. Donald M. Drake Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Spencer v. BP John Furniture CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API