Legal Opinion
People v. Hluboky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 24, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1021The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made because the court failed to enumerate the constitutional rights that he was waiving is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw his plea of guilty on this ground prior to the imposition of sentence (see CPL 220.60 [3]; 470.05 [2]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v Reyes, 41 AD3d 620 [2007]; People v Wright, 34 AD3d 507 [2006]; People v Mitchell, 22 AD3d 769 [2005]; People v Singleton, 107 AD2d 828 [1985]). Furthermore, the narrow exception to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MunizNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. ApplingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. EcclestonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. EcclestonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014