People v. Eccleston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
At the plea allocution, the County Court sufficiently advised the defendant of the nature of the right to appeal, and the record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived that right (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his claims that the procedure used to adjudicate him a second felony offender was defective (see People v Huggins, 105 AD3d 760, 761 [2013]; People v Kosse, 94 AD3d 908 [2012]; People v Lassiter, 48 AD3d 700 [2008]),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. ApplingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HugginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. KosseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. DuryeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MallahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. ConnorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. DuryeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.