Legal Opinion
Albert Pick & Co. v. Slimmer
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 14, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Assumpsit, on an account stated. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman
This was an action of assumpsit upon an alleged account stated made in settlement of services rendered by appellee to appellant.
The statement was in writing, and was prepared by the secretary of appellant and given to appellee. It is as follows:
“ Albert Pick, Pres. Abe Bloch, Sec’y & Treas.
STATEMENT.
Chicago, May 1, 1896.
M Ed. Slimmer, (
In account with Albert Pick & Co., successors to Pick Bloch & Joel, Importers, Jobbers and Dealers and Complete Outfitters of Bars,
Hotels and Restaurants.
199, 201 & 203 Randolph St.
Telephone, Main 1885.
' Cr.....................................$3,000.
Dr.
Drawings.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKinster v. HitchcookNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Gruby v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883
- St. Louis Lager Beer Bottling Co. v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Phelps v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pure Torpedo Corp. v. NationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Canadian Ace Brewing Co. v. Swiftsure Beer Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958