Legal Opinion

Kennamer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1938No. 8 Div. 678PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary in the second degree. Gen. Acts Ala. 1935 p. 159; Sec. 3481 (1), Michie and Sublett’s 1936 Cumulative Supplement to the Michie’s Alabama Code of 1928.

We think it is now definitely established that testimony as to an effort of one accused of crime to compromise or settle or adjust the charge against him, made after his arrest but before his trial, is inadmissible against him on his trial, unless such testimony is as to his “making a voluntary offer of settlement * * * which embodies an express admission of guilt.” At least that is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. American Ry. Express Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Gaines v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Burch v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Jackson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Lankford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  5. Waller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API