Legal Opinion
Murray Co. v. Continental Gin Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware
Decided October 12, 1903No. 240PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
BRADFORD, District Judge.
The Continental Gin Company has demurred to a bill brought against it by The Murray Company charging infringement of letters patent of the United States Nos. 472,607, 488,446 and 644,532, and containing the usual prayers. Four grounds of demurrer were assigned; but at the hearing the counsel for the defendant abandoned the third and fourth, and confined his argument to the first and second grounds, which are as follows :
“Hirst, that it does not appear from said bill of complaint that the defendant herein is positively charged with infringement of the letters patent in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyd v. Nebraska Ex Rel. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coryell v. KlehmIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Wells v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
- Elliott & Hatch Book-Typewriter Co. v. Fisher Typewriter Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1901
- Campbell v. Paris & Decatur RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1938
- Helmet Co. v. Wm. Wrigley, Jr., Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
- Paramino Lumber Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1937