Legal Opinion

Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 19, 1937No. 1147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, District Judge.

Action in equity by complainants employer and insurance carrier to enjoin further proceedings, subsequent to unreviewed final order of August 26, 1931, upon the claim of John T. Clark, employee, before the Deputy Commissioner under Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq. Claimant Clark, by answer, alleges his right to so further proceed by virtue of Private Act April 10, 1936, No. 445, c. 198, 74th Congress (H.R. 4439), 49 Stat. 2244, in effect dispensing as to him with the previously existing time limit for reviewing or changing…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Tennessee Publishing Co. v. American National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Holt v. Indiana Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Emmons v. SmittDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
  3. In re Royal-Wilhelm Furniture Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1938
  4. Allied Poultry Processors Co. v. PolinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API