Becker v. Port Dock Four, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Plaintiffs Becker and Silmot, Inc., brought this legal malpractice action against defendant Carstens (defendant) for his failure to include certain conditions in the deed by which the Beckers conveyed real property to defendant Port Dock Four, Inc. The Beckers retained ownership of the parcel adjoining that property, and Silmot continued to operate a restaurant on the land which the Beckers retained. Under the land sale contract between the Beckers and Port Dock Four, the purchaser was required to convey a five-foot strip of the property to the City of Newport, which would in turn credit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- BRINK ET UX v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Sommerfeldt v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Daskalos v. KellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Pizel v. ZuspannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Clark v. RoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Son v. Ashland Community Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Pontiac School District v. Miller, Canfield, Paddock & StoneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.