Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kitchen Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.,

after, stating tbe case: Considering tbat it is as much tbe duty of tbe master to exercise care in providing the servant with reasonably safe means and methods of work, such as proper assistants for performing bis task, as it is to furnish him a safe place and proper tools and appliances, we see no distinguishing difference in principle between tbe instant case and Bradford v. English, 190 N. C., 742, 130 S. E., 705, and Pigford v. R. R., 160 N. C., 93, 75 S. E., 860. Tbe judgment of nonsuit, therefore, entered herein, will be reversed on authority of these recent decisions.

Revers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pigford v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Bradford v. EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Bradford v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API