Legal Opinion

Harrod v. Bisson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1911No. 6,885PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Prom Allen Circuit Court; E. O’Rourke, Judge. Action by Mary Bisson against Morse Harrod. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

This is an action against appellant, to recover damages alleged to have resulted from the negligent and unskilful manner in which he reduced and treated- appellee’s fractured and injured wrist and hand. The amended complaint is in three paragraphs. The substance of the first is as follows-: That on August 25, 1904, appellant was a practicing physician and surgeon; that on said day appellee fell from a chair, and dislocated, bruised and injured the bones in her left wrist and hand; that appellant *551undertook to set>said bones, and to cure sucb injuries, but, in Ms endeavor so to do he was so…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Taber v. HutsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Boor v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Weinberger v. BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Hill v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Harmon v. HaasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API