Crooker v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FEBRUARY 15, 1995
PONSOR, District Judge.
Objections overruled for the reasons stated in the defendant’s opposition. The recommendation is adopted and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is hereby ALLOWED. The clerk will prepare a judgment for defendant. So ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This action arises under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, as Plaintiff claims that the Defendant Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Action Committee for Transit, Inc. v. Town of Chevy ChaseCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016