Legal Opinion

York v. Carlisle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Milam. Tried below before Hon. W. M. McGregor.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by appellee Carlisle against Mrs. York and George Lewis to recover damages claimed to have resulted to appellee by reason of the levy of a distress warrant sued out by Mrs. York, in a case pending in the justice court, wherein she was plaintiff and one C. T. Pierce was defendant. The warrant was levied by George Lewis, as constable, upon a mare, as the property of C. T. Pierce, but the ownership of which was claimed by the appellee. The suit by the appellee is in effect one for the conversion of the animal. He recovered judgment in the court below for $300…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Freeman v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Nichols v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Lee v. KingsburyTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Rosenberg v. ShaperTexas Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. William Johnson Hamman v. Southwestern Gas Pipeline, Inc., a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Frith v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Bowser v. Cain Auto Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Parsons v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Sharp v. JesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API