Legal Opinion

Motz v. National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 6, 1981No. 60502PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

This case involves summary judgment, on a promissory note. The appellant-defendant (Charles S. Motz) alleges the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment because there were issues of fact regarding the method of payment of the promissory note.

By his answers to appellee’s interrogatories, relied on in opposing summary judgment, the appellant alleges there were prior and contemporaneous oral agreements that altered the language of the promissory notes by providing that payment was to be made through payment of renewal commissions which appellant was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dolanson Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Hyman v. HorwitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hanover Insurance v. Nelson Conveyor & MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Wagner v. Howell Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Tyson v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Minor v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Marchman Oil & Chemical Company, Inc. v. Southern Petroleum Trading Company Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API