Legal Opinion

Burnes v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 5, 1925PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, C. J.

The indictment in this case charges I. W. Berry and Daniel Burnes with breaking and entering a building. There was a verdict of guilty as charged and judgment accordingly. Writ of error was taken by Daniel Burnes to review the judgment.

There are two assignments of error. The first presents the question of the alleged insufficient endorsement on the back of the indictment. So far as is necessary to present the question, the endorsement is as follows: “Indictment for Breaking and Entering. PI. B. Knapp. A True Bill. Foreman of the Grand Jury.”

The statute requires indictments to be signed by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Loyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Bennett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Cacciatore v. DrumbrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Suiero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Addison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API