Legal Opinion

Joyce v. Explosives Technologies International, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 17, 1993No. 3—93—0373PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE McCUSKEY

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiffs, Terrance E. Joyce, Kelly Fogarty, Maureen Joyce, Michael Laird and Roxanne Hooper, filed a complaint against the defendant, Explosives Technologies International, Inc. (ETI), under the Structural Work Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 48, par. 60 et seq.) claiming damages for the death of their father, John Joyce. The trial court granted ETI’s motion to dismiss the complaint because the decedent’s widow had already filed a complaint grounded on the Act. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Handley v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Harvel v. City of Johnston CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Claffy v. Chicago Dock & Canal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Scully v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. City of Chicago v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Powell v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Orlowski v. Village of Villa Park Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. In re Application of the County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. In re Application of the County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API