Legal Opinion

Bristol v. Pitchard

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 18, 1908PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action by a conservator, founded on a claim for moneys obtained from his ward, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County, Scott, J.; judgment for defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.

The only exceptions pursued by the appellant relate to the refusal of a. trial by jury.

The original complaint was by a conservator, and charged the defendants with fraudulently obtaining money from the ward, by taking advantage of his mental weakness, under a trust to help him take care of it, but with the design of unlawfully appropriating it, which they afterward did. The plaintiff claimed “by way of equitable relief” several specified kinds of judgment, the last two being: “4. A money judgment for $550 damages. 5. Such other general or specific, legal and equitable relief or both-, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meriden Savings Bank v. McCormackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  2. Adams v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  3. Fuller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  4. Avery v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berry v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Shelinsky v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  3. Doris v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. D'Andrea v. RendeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Home Banking & Realty Co. v. BaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API