Legal Opinion
Otto v. Hirl
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided February 24, 1950No. Civ. 1-5PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWITZER, District Judge.
Plaintiff originally commenced this action in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Service was obtained upon the defendants at Davenport, Iowa, whereupon said defendants filed their motion to quash in the District Court of Minnesota, which was sustained. Subsequently, plaintiff dismissed his case in the Minnesota District and started the same action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, with personal service upon the defendants.
The motion of the plaintiff for a “change of place of trial,” as nominated in said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Isaacks v. JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Goldenberg v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Armstrong Cork Co. v. Merchants' Refrigerating Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. ReidDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1952
- Berk v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1952
- Mitchell v. GundlachDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Rogers v. HalfordDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1952
- Herzog v. Central Steel Tube Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.