Legal Opinion

Danuser v. JA Thompson and Son, Inc.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1982No. 8068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HEEN, J.

Employer J. A. Thompson and Son, Inc. and its insurance carrier Industrial Indemnity Co. (collectively Thompson), appeal from the May 1, 1980 decision and order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (Board) which found that Thompson was a special employer of claimant Richard Danuser (Danuser) and was therefore required to pay Workers’ Compensation benefits to Danuser. The only issue on appeal is whether the Board erred in that finding. We find no error and affirm.

In 1973, Thompson was engaged, as a general contractor, in the construction of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stempel v. Department of Water ResourcesWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hayes v. YountWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dolan v. RustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. DeFries v. ASSOCIATION OF OWNERS, 999 WILDERHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Petras v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yarnell v. City Roofing, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Feliciano v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement SystemHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Yarnell v. City Roofing, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Frank v. Hawaii Planing Mill FoundationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API