Legal Opinion

Brock v. Dorman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 12, 1936PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to try and determine title to real estate in Clinton County. All parties claimed under the will of James Brock, who died in 1915. The case was tried as a jury waived law case, but no findings of fact or declarations of law were asked or made. The court adjudged plaintiff to be the owner in fee simple of the land and defendants have appealed from this judgment.

The will of James Brock devised the land in question to his son Samuel Brock, "to have and to hold, during his natural life and after his death to go to his heirs." He made similar devises of other land to another son…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hockaday v. LynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Gardner v. VanlandinghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Puterbaugh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. Clarkson v. HattonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. KaltenbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. Bedinger v. Graybill's & TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  3. Leeper v. LeeperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Hughes v. NeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Delaney v. First National Bank in AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API