Legal Opinion

Nathan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 24, 2012No. Case No. 1:11-cv-1360 (AJT/TRJ)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ANTHONY J. TRENGA, District Judge.

Plaintiff Noah Nathan (“Nathan”) claims that because of his child-care duties, defendants Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Takeda”) discriminated against him and subjected him to a hostile work environment, and also retaliated against him for complaining about his mistreatment, all in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. This matter is before the Court on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. Mod-U-Kraf Homes, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
  2. Gilliam v. Bertie County Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  3. Hall v. Sizewise Rentals LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  4. McCoy v. University of Virginia Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020
  5. Melissa Racklin v. Zeta Global Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API