Legal Opinion

Helm v. Wismar

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 17, 1991No. 73929PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Chief Justice.

Donald S. Helm sued Jack Wismar and Wismar’s employer, Eaton-Kenway, Inc., for personal injury damages arising out of an automobile accident. His wife, Jean, joined as a plaintiff seeking recovery for loss of consortium. The trial judge directed a verdict against the plaintiffs and in favor of the employer at the close of the plaintiff’s case. The jury returned a verdict for Donald and against Wismar in the amount of $125,000, but found for the defendant on Jean’s claim. The plaintiffs appealed and Wismar did not. The Court of Appeals, Eastern District, affirmed. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Hudson v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Lawton v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McHaffie Ex Rel. McHaffie v. BunchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Davis v. Lambert-St. Louis International AirportSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Saint Louis University v. GearySupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Thornburg v. Federal Express Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. In Re CaranchiniSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API