Legal Opinion

City of Bismarck v. Stuart

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1996No. Criminal No. 950383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Ronald Stuart appeals from his conviction for driving while under suspension. Stuart argues that he has a constitutional right to operate an automobile on public roads without a driver’s license. No court has ever held that it is an impermissible infringement upon a citizen’s constitutional Right to Travel for the Legislature to decree that, unless exempted by statute, every person who operates a motor vehicle on public roads must have a valid operator’s license, as NDCC 39-06-01 and following sections mandate. See State v. Skurdal, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 (1988); City of Salina v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SkurdalMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. KoubaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. StuartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Boutin v. ConwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. City of Salina v. WisdenUtah Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Bismarck v. StuartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API